Insights 3.28

Comment

Insights 3.28

Design: 

 

Machines for Moving : 

  • Clearpath Robotics unveiled a smaller warehouse logistics bot, for dealing with sub-pallet sized loads. They are a fascinating and fast moving company, with a public commitment from their CTO to never produce a robot that can kill. In lieu of sprawling DARPA-esque research projects that underpin the product development cycles of many robotics companies, Clearpath has been been stepping up development of nimble, straight to commercial application robotics systems. For an industry that has been heavily buttressed by military spending, it's looking like a business model that embraces a more peaceful vision of the future can also be profitable. 

 

Technology as a Threat: 

  • The dangers of trusting data collection and databases implicitly: you may be in a gang database and not even know it. Now that everyone in tech is talking about big data, quantification and authentication, we're looking at a potential future riddled with two truths and a lie x 1000 with little transparency to even know what might need to be corrected or appealed. 

 

Just a Game: 

  • How graphics cards developed for videogames have revolutionized machine learning and rapidly created a new class of computers that can beat us at just about any game. 
  • The phenomenon of people playing games based on their day jobs in their free time. As the article gets at, this can be read as a symptom of a workforce that is increasingly limited in their autonomy and frustrated by an uncertain path to success within an overbearing organization. If we understand that stats and quick confirmation of success is such a powerful motivator, are there tools that could be created to preserve engagement in far more abstract / slow return of results professions like education or urban planning? With AI and automation fast on the heels of routine work of all stripes (blue and white collar) we will need an economy filled with the sort of jobs that require increasing levels of abstraction without clear metrics. 


P.S. - we are hiring: looking for candidates to fill an operations role, which would encompass administrative tasks along with some design and prototyping help. We're also looking for designer / engineer type people (a formal degree in either field is nota requirement, overall design/building aptitude and attitude are more important to us.)
 

More next week.

Comment

Insights 3.20

Comment

Insights 3.20

Roadmapping the Future: 

 

Machines for Moving : 

 

Virtually There: 

 

Automatons: 

  • A tough week for companies building complex robotics systems: Google is looking to sell off Boston Dynamics, a robotics company best known for their groundbreaking DARPA projects. They acquired Boston Dynamics back in 2013, according to Bloomberg, Google is looking to shed Boston Dynamics because they are unlikely to produce a marketable product in the next few years. Agricultural and warehouse robot maker Harvest Automation has cut their staff significantly, from about 30 people in 2015, now down to "just a handful." Both companies have built amazing devices and equipment, but the market turbulence they face is indicative of the fact that instrumenting and acting upon the physical world with truly autonomous tech in a way that nets a positive value for buyers is a Herculean feat. For all our foibles, humans remain the most practical and economical source of labor, even in fairly predictable contexts. 

 

More next week.

Comment

Insights 3.13

Comment

Insights 3.13

Body/Image: 

 

Feeding the Future : 

 

Machines for Moving: 

  • Jaybridge Robotics was acquired by Toyota to join their AI team, presumably to work on self-driving cars. General Motors picked up driverless car startup Cruise Automation. Whether incumbent auto makers are going to win the race for truly autonomous (and safe) vehicles instead of Tesla, Google or others remains to be seen - but the auto giants seem to be hedging their bets by buying their way into the bleeding edge and domain knowledge outside of their own. To be sure, a household name will be helpful for convincing the public of the safety and reliability of self-driving, but when the trust is more about the quality of the technology than the quality of the engine, a name synonymous with sedans might lose out to a name synonymous with search. 


  

Building Things: 

  
 

More next week.

Comment